Twitter Rebuts Musk’s Fraud Claim in Dispute Over Fake Accounts

Twitter has accused Elon Musk, in a lawsuit, of abandoning his deliberate acquisition of the corporate as a result of inventory market turbulence made the deal harder for him. However firing again in a authorized submitting, Mr. Musk says it was Twitter that torpedoed the $44 billion acquisition.

Mr. Musk argues that Twitter hid the true variety of inauthentic accounts on its platform, accusing the corporate of fraud. Such accounts made up no less than 10 p.c of Twitter’s day by day lively customers who see advertisements, Mr. Musk’s authorized workforce asserted, reiterating worries that he expressed shortly after signing the deal in April. Twitter has maintained that the determine is lower than 5 p.c.

Twitter additionally hid the variety of its customers who see advertisements, legal professionals for Mr. Musk stated within the submitting, which was made public on Thursday. Through the first quarter of the yr, 65 million of the corporate’s 229 million day by day lively customers didn’t see advertisements, based on the submitting.

Twitter stated that Mr. Musk was making an attempt “to distort knowledge acquired from Twitter to sponsor wild conclusions” and that its figures have been correct.

Utilizing Botometer, a instrument designed by Indiana College to measure inauthentic accounts, analysts for Mr. Musk discovered greater numbers of inauthentic accounts than Twitter had disclosed, based on the submitting. Their evaluation was preliminary and shall be expanded, the submitting stated.

The misrepresentations hid weaknesses in Twitter’s enterprise mannequin and tricked Mr. Musk into agreeing to purchase Twitter at “an inflated value,” legal professionals for the Tesla government stated.

“Twitter was miscounting the variety of false and spam accounts on its platform, as a part of its scheme to mislead buyers concerning the firm’s prospects,” legal professionals for Mr. Musk wrote. “Twitter’s disclosures have slowly unraveled, with Twitter frantically closing the gates on info in a determined bid to forestall the Musk events from uncovering its fraud.”

The submitting, made final Friday however saved confidential till Thursday, was Mr. Musk’s first in depth response in what is predicted to be a protracted authorized battle between the social media firm and one of many richest individuals on the planet. A trial is ready for October.

“His claims are factually inaccurate, legally inadequate and commercially irrelevant,” Bret Taylor, the chairman of Twitter’s board, stated in a press release on Thursday. The corporate additionally responded to Mr. Musk’s claims in a authorized submitting.

The Botometer instrument is unreliable, Twitter stated in its submitting. The corporate famous that the instrument used completely different requirements from Twitter’s inner calculations and had as soon as deemed Mr. Musk’s Twitter account “extremely prone to be a bot.”

Mr. Musk started snapping up shares of Twitter early this yr and by April had turn into the corporate’s largest shareholder. He rejected Twitter’s provide to affix its board, as a substitute launching a swift and aggressive takeover try. However as soon as Twitter agreed to the acquisition, Mr. Musk started to precise doubts. In July, he indicated that he not needed to purchase the corporate.

Twitter sued Mr. Musk in Delaware Chancery Court docket in an try to pressure the acquisition by. Twitter has claimed he misplaced curiosity within the deal because the market slumped and shares in Twitter and the electrical carmaker Tesla, which is the first supply of Mr. Musk’s wealth, declined.

“Musk refuses to honor his obligations to Twitter and its stockholders as a result of the deal he signed not serves his private pursuits,” Twitter stated in its lawsuit.

Over the previous couple of days, the corporate peppered Mr. Musk’s banks, monetary companions and associates with subpoenas, demanding communications concerning the deal that would make clear why Mr. Musk determined to stroll away.

The deal features a “particular efficiency” clause that permits Twitter to sue to pressure the deal by as long as the debt that the billionaire has corralled for the acquisition is in place. However Mr. Musk could pay a $1 billion charge to exit the deal if his funding falls by.

Mr. Musk has maintained that Twitter is flooded with pretend accounts and that the corporate has misled him concerning the true variety of impostors on its platform. Faux accounts are used to unfold spam or manipulate Twitter’s service by falsely amplifying tendencies, and are sometimes automated relatively than run by actual individuals.

Twitter earns the majority of its income from promoting. However Mr. Musk asserted that advertisers wouldn’t attain the shoppers they meant if Twitter was flooded with pretend accounts. His legal professionals argued that inaccuracies in Twitter’s consumer metrics amounted to a fabric adversarial have an effect on on the enterprise, permitting him to desert the acquisition.

Twitter stated in a message to workers that was seen by The New York Instances that it had chosen to not redact any of Mr. Musk’s claims as a result of it was assured in its metrics. “We provide our clients a extremely subtle set of instruments and options to run and measure the effectiveness of their campaigns throughout our platform, with a basis of transparency,” stated Sean Edgett, Twitter’s basic counsel.

On Thursday, Mr. Musk continued to weigh in on how Twitter may change. “I do perceive the product fairly properly, so I believe I’ve bought a very good sense of the place to level the engineering workforce at Twitter to make it radically higher,” he stated throughout a gathering of Tesla shareholders.

Mike Isaac and Jack Ewing contributed reporting.

Trump Suggests Putin Just Claim He Won


PALM BEACH (The Borowitz Report)—Because the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues to come across difficulties, Donald J. Trump has suggested Vladimir Putin “simply to say that he received.”

“He must get on TV and say that he’s the winner,” Trump stated. “He ought to say that he had a victory in Ukraine such as you wouldn’t consider.”

Trump stated that the Russian President ought to maintain rallies throughout the nation to inform his supporters that he received however that his victory had been stolen from him.

“I believed Putin was good, however possibly he’s not so good in spite of everything,” Trump stated. “If he doesn’t say he received, he’s some type of silly dummy.”

Trump stated that, since his calls to the Russian chief saved going straight to voice mail, he left Putin a suggestion of what he ought to inform the Russian individuals.

“All he must say is, ‘Frankly, we did win this invasion,’ ” Trump stated.

Did astronomers see hints of first stars? Experiment casts doubt on bold claim


An white table shaped antenna from the EDGES experiment in Western Australia

The EDGES antenna. Researchers utilizing the instrument reported proof from the cosmic daybreak in 2018.Credit score: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Analysis Organisation

The primary main try to duplicate hanging proof of the ‘cosmic daybreak’ — the looks of the Universe’s first stars 180 million years after the Huge Bang — has muddled the image.

4 years after radioastronomers reported discovering a signature of the cosmic daybreak, radioastronomer Ravi Subrahmanyan and his collaborators describe how they floated an antenna on a reservoir alongside the Sharavati river, within the Indian state of Karnataka, seeking that sign. “Once we appeared for it, we didn’t discover it,” says Subrahmanyan, who led the hassle on the Raman Analysis Institute in Bengaluru, India. His group’s outcomes seem as we speak in Nature Astronomy1.

The findings are “a vital landmark within the subject”, says Anastasia Fialkov, a theoretical physicist on the College of Cambridge, UK. She and others had been unconvinced that the cosmic-dawn indicators had been actual. The Raman group’s outcomes are the primary to place the declare to a critical check, she says — however she thinks that they don’t but have the ability to fully rule it out.

First detection

The unique outcomes precipitated a sensation in cosmology circles, as a result of they had been the primary to say to have found signatures of the cosmic daybreak. Mild from probably the most historical stars within the observable Universe has needed to journey for practically 14 billion years to achieve Earth — to date that it’s too faint to view straight with odd telescopes. However radioastronomers have been in search of an oblique impact, utilizing the spectrum of radio waves. Ultraviolet mild from the primary stars would have precipitated interstellar hydrogen, which is in any other case clear throughout many of the electromagnetic spectrum, to be barely opaque to a selected radio wavelength.

In 20182, astronomers reported seeing a dip within the primordial radio spectrum, centred at a frequency of about 78 megahertz — which the group took to be proof of the cosmic daybreak. The researchers used a coffee-table-shaped instrument within the Australian outback, known as Experiment to Detect the International Epoch of Reionization Signature (EDGES).

However the EDGES sign appeared to be an excessive amount of of a very good factor. The dip within the spectrum was deeper and wider than cosmological theories had predicted. To clarify such a big imprint, theoretical physicists proposed a variety of unique mechanisms, such because the presence of beforehand unknown elementary particles with electrical fees hundreds of instances smaller than an electron’s.

Numerous different researchers raised issues, emphasizing the issue of discovering the cosmic-dawn radio signature. Radio waves from the early Universe are drowned out by a cacophony of noise produced by sources within the Galaxy, that are hundreds of instances louder. In search of primordial signatures within the spectrum is corresponding to attempting to identify the silhouettes of timber on a mountaintop from many kilometres away, explains Saleem Zaroubi, an astrophysicist on the College of Groningen within the Netherlands.

To subtract the galactic spectrum appropriately, researchers must calculate with excessive precision how their instrument and the surroundings round it reply to numerous radio wavelengths, also referred to as the experiment’s systematics. The EDGES group went to nice efforts to mannequin the consequences brought on by the desert soil on the Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory in Western Australia, for instance, and spent two years double-checking the information earlier than publishing them. However some scientists remained unconvinced.

New experiments

Since then, quite a few competing experiments have been trying to cross-check the EDGES findings. In an effort to flee the confounding presence of radio-frequency interference from human actions — and specifically from FM radio stations — groups have been establishing antennas in a few of Earth’s most distant locales.

Subrahmanyan, who’s now on the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Analysis Organisation (CSIRO) in Perth, Australia, took the unprecedented strategy of occurring water. He and his group went to lakes in India to drift successive incarnations of their instrument, known as Formed Antenna Measurement of the Background Radio Spectrum (SARAS). SARAS had a conical form supposed to make its response to radio waves simple to calculate, and the water beneath meant that the group didn’t must cope with the unsure construction and radio properties of the terrain.

SARAS 3 radiometer floating on the Sharavati backwaters in India

The SARAS 3 antenna offered outcomes suggesting that the EDGES sign was brought on by instrument error.Credit score: Ravi Subrahmanyan

“I used to be impressed by the cleverness they utilized within the design of the instrument,” says Lincoln Greenhill, a radioastronomer on the Harvard–Smithsonian Middle for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The SARAS group initially experimented on high-altitude lakes, however the water was both too salty or not salty sufficient, which affected the way it transmitted radio waves. Ultimately, the researchers discovered a lake with simply the correct salinity nearer to residence. They took information with an antenna known as SARAS 3, which they floated on a styrofoam raft in a reservoir alongside the Sharavati river, in March 2020.

Subrahmanyan says that the SARAS 3 outcomes rule out the EDGES detection of a cosmic-dawn signature. “So far as we’re involved, it’s not astrophysical,” he says. The reason for the dip noticed by EDGES is probably instrument error, the authors word within the paper. Nevertheless, Subrahmanyan says it’s tough to invest about what sort of impact might have produced the 2018 end result.

Not over but

“We’re happy to see SARAS 3 performing nicely and capable of make measurements on the ranges wanted to seek for spectral buildings much like these we present in EDGES observations,” says Judd Bowman, an astronomer at Arizona State College in Tempe who’s the lead scientist for EDGES. However Bowman will not be satisfied that SARAS 3 has dominated out his group’s outcomes. “These are difficult measurements, and most of the potential systematic points that may have an effect on EDGES may happen for SARAS 3,” he says.

The SARAS group has not spoken the final phrase on the EDGES findings, says Cynthia Chiang, a radioastronomer at McGill College in Montreal, Canada. “Removed from it,” she says. Chiang leads an experiment that’s trying to detect the cosmic-dawn signature from Marion Island, off the coast of South Africa. She can also be concerned in an experiment within the Canadian Arctic and one which may be deployed within the Chilean Andes.

Numerous different efforts are underneath approach, and extra are beginning up. Subrahmanyan is beginning a brand new experiment at CSIRO, and his former collaborator at Raman, the experimental cosmologist Saurabh Singh, will proceed assessments with a brand new SARAS antenna. Singh can also be participating in a proposal to the Indian Area Analysis Organisation for a spacecraft that might escape Earthly radio-frequency interference by conducting measurements whereas on the far facet of the Moon. Regardless of the final future of the EDGES declare, Singh says the group behind it deserves credit score for the renewed curiosity within the cosmic daybreak. “It revived this analysis space,” he says.

Brian Flores: Former Miami Dolphins coach sues NFL & teams in racism claim


Brian Flores
Flores was sacked by the Miami Dolphins final month

Former Miami Dolphins coach Brian Flores is suing the NFL, the New York Giants and each different NFL franchise alleging racial discrimination in hiring practices.

Flores, who was handed over for a job with the Giants final week, stated the league and its house owners ran their operation “like a plantation”.

He has filed a category motion lawsuit within the US courts.

The league and groups have denied the racism claims.

The go well with, filed on the primary day of Black Historical past Month within the US, begins with an errant textual content message stated to be from New England coach Invoice Belichick congratulating who he thought was Brian Daboll on getting the Giants job.

Nevertheless, it was Flores he was texting with, three days earlier than Flores interviewed with the workforce.

Along with the NFL and Giants, the Dolphins and Denver Broncos are named as defendants together with ‘John Doe Groups 1-29’, that means each different NFL franchise.

The lawsuit says: “In sure vital methods, the NFL is racially segregated and is managed very like a plantation.

“Its 32 house owners – none of whom are black – revenue considerably from the labour of NFL gamers, 70% of whom are black.”

Flores alleges he was fired after rejecting a proposal from Dolphins proprietor Stephen Ross for $100,000 for each defeat late within the season which might have improved the membership’s place within the low season entry draft.

He additionally says he refused to violate the league’s tampering guidelines when proprietor Ross organized a gathering between Flores and a “distinguished quarterback”.

“After the incident, Mr Flores was handled with disdain and held out as somebody who was non-compliant and tough to work with,” the go well with reads.

“From that time ahead, Mr Flores was ostracised and in the end he was fired.”

Flores, 40, completed with a 24-25 document over three seasons at Miami.

The go well with was filed in america District Court docket for the Southern District of New York and purportedly reveals display screen grabs from Flores’ telephone of textual content messages between he and Belichick.

“I hear from Buffalo & NYG that you’re their man,” Belichick is alleged to have texted Flores, mistaking him for Daboll.

Belichick apologised when he realised his mistake and stated: “I double checked and I misinterpret the textual content. I believe they’re naming Daboll. I am sorry about that.”

The lawsuit says Flores subsequently gave an intensive interview for a job he already knew he wouldn’t get.

“An interview that was held for no purpose aside from for the Giants to exhibit falsely to the League Commissioner Roger Goodell and the general public at massive that it was in compliance with the Rooney Rule,” it says.

The Rooney Rule, launched by the NFL in 2003, states golf equipment should interview a minimum of one black, Asian or minority ethnic candidate for every head coach and common supervisor emptiness.

In a press release put out by his regulation agency, Flores stated: “God has gifted me with a particular expertise to educate the sport of soccer, however the want for change is larger than my private targets.

“My honest hope is that by standing up in opposition to systemic racism within the NFL, others will be part of me to make sure that constructive change is made for generations to return.”

The Broncos have been named within the go well with for his or her “sham interview” with Flores in 2019.

“It was clear from the substance of the interview that Mr Flores was interviewed solely due to the Rooney Rule, and that the Broncos by no means had any intention to think about him as a reliable candidate for the job,” the go well with reads.

What do the NFL and groups say?

The NFL stated Flores’ allegations have been baseless and it was dedicated to offering equal alternatives.

“Variety is core to every part we do, and there are few points on which our golf equipment and our inside management workforce spend extra time. We’ll defend in opposition to these claims, that are with out advantage,” it stated.

The Dolphins launched a press release saying they “vehemently deny any allegations of racial discrimination”.

“The implication that we acted in a fashion inconsistent with the integrity of the sport is inaccurate,” the workforce stated.

The Giants stated: “We’re happy and assured with the method that resulted within the hiring of Brian Daboll.

“We interviewed a powerful and numerous group of candidates. The actual fact of the matter is, Brian Flores was within the dialog to be our head coach till the eleventh hour.

“Finally, we employed the person we felt was most certified to be our subsequent head coach.”

In his grievance in opposition to the Broncos, Flores stated then-general supervisor John Elway and president Joe Ellis confirmed up an hour late to the interview, including “it was apparent that that they had ingesting closely the night time earlier than”.

The Broncos referred to as these allegations “blatantly false” of their assertion.

“There have been 5 Broncos executives current for the interview, which lasted roughly three and a half hours – the absolutely allotted time and concluded shortly earlier than 11am,” it stated.

“Pages of detailed notes, evaluation and evaluations from our interview exhibit the depth of our dialog and honest curiosity in Mr Flores as a head teaching candidate.

“The Broncos will vigorously defend the integrity and values of our group – and its workers – from such baseless and disparaging claims.”

Around the BBC iPlayer bannerAround the BBC iPlayer footer